H21 evaluation results support our R&D activities
In October 2021 (H21) we nominated 11 R&D results within the Module 1 - Quality of Selected Results, that is part of annual evolution of research organizations, within the Methodology17+, Methodology for Evaluating Research Organisations and Research, Development and Innovation Purpose-tied Aid Programmes.
The Faculty is grateful to all researchers, who contribute to this Module and undergo critical evaluation of their R&D activities.
The overview of the evaluated results nominated either in the category Contribution to knowledge (CK) or Social relevance (SR) and their grades is in the table below.
|
R&D result |
Category |
Grade |
|
Supervised segmentation toolbox using machine learning for 3D Slicer (Software) |
SR |
4 |
|
A method of forming solder spherical outlets on a housing of an electronic component by means of a template and a template for implementing this method (Patent CZ, No. 307441) |
SR |
3 |
|
STM probe from graphite material and methods of its preparation (Functional sample) |
SR |
3 |
|
Interior Space Mapping Platform (Functional sample) |
SR |
4 |
|
Hybrid energy system (Prototype) |
SR |
3 |
|
Supercapacitors: Properties and applications (Journal paper) |
CK |
4 |
|
Digital measuring data-logger to monitor production of vacuum tubes (Functional sample) |
SR |
4 |
|
Power transconductance amplifier with switch-mode end stage (Utility sample CZ, No. 33996) |
SR |
4 |
|
Prototype of distributed measuring units V-dip ready (Prototype) |
SR |
3 |
|
Multiplexer for electrical impedance tomography (Functional sample) |
SR |
4 |
|
Half-face mask BUT H2 (Prototype) |
SR |
4 |
The full list of evaluation results of the R&D results nominated within H21 by other research institutions from the Czech Republic can be found here, where the results for the previous evaluations can also be found.
Briefly about the Module 1 evaluation
The research initiations annually select a set of R&D results that already have the impact to society, or have high potential to reach such impact soon. After preparing a self-evaluation report justifying the impact of our R&D results, they are subsequently assessed by an expert panel within the review procedure, processed by the Office of the Government. The nominated results are evaluated either in the category Contribution to knowledge or Social relevance.
Results nominated in the category Contribution to knowledge are rather results of basic research that are further investigated in term of possible implementation in applied research oriented research. Results nominated in the category Social relevance are expected to have already society-economic impact.
For both categories, a 5 level qualitative grading is defined. For Contribution to knowledge the grades are world-leading, excellent, internationally recognized, nationally recognized, and inadequate. For Social relevance the grades are world-leading, excellent, very good, average, and below average.
For more information about the evaluation of research institutions, please follow this link.
| Responsible person | prof. Ing. Jaroslav Koton, Ph.D. |
|---|---|
| Date of publication |